I've been pretty busy lately and have neglected my blog, not that anyone's noticed yet besides me! Who knows if anyone will ever read this!
I want to thank S.E.A.L. Team Six and all those involved in Osama bin Laden assuming room temperature. Better late than never. Terrorists need to know that when they do what they do we will administer justice no matter how long it takes. That will act as a deterrent. We must stand strong, or we will fall. Some things in this often cruel world will never change regardless of our "good intentions".
Monday, May 2, 2011
Friday, February 25, 2011
Obama's Deafening Silence on Libya
Obama had plenty to say about Egypt and Mubarek, but on Libya and its lovable dictator Mumar Ghadafi he's strangely silent. He seems to favor anyone who doesn't like the West. It looks to me like we have an anti-American president. He doesn't seem to stand for freedom, that is, in any country whose leader is an enemy of the West.
There is more turmoil than usual around the world lately and it seems he likes it that way. He's doing nothing to lend stability to anything here or abroad. I'd say he's incompetent but it looks to me like he's doing it on purpose. I don't believe he's stupid. No one can be wrong all the time unless he's trying, so that leaves me with words like saboteur and traitor. He took an oath to uphold, protect, and defend the constitution, but it appears he doesn't believe in it. He declared the other day that the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional so his administration will refuse to enforce the law. Since when was it the place of the executive branch to make such decisions? That is up to the courts. Our commander-in-chief is an outlaw.
There is more turmoil than usual around the world lately and it seems he likes it that way. He's doing nothing to lend stability to anything here or abroad. I'd say he's incompetent but it looks to me like he's doing it on purpose. I don't believe he's stupid. No one can be wrong all the time unless he's trying, so that leaves me with words like saboteur and traitor. He took an oath to uphold, protect, and defend the constitution, but it appears he doesn't believe in it. He declared the other day that the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional so his administration will refuse to enforce the law. Since when was it the place of the executive branch to make such decisions? That is up to the courts. Our commander-in-chief is an outlaw.
Saturday, February 19, 2011
Three Cheers for Joel Northrup!
Nowadays it takes a 15-year-old boy to give us a reality check. He forfeited his first-round Iowa state wrestling tournament match this week because he was matched-up against a girl. Gentlemen still exist!
When I played hockey in the 1970's feminism was going full-steam ahead, but girls were not allowed to play full-contact sports with boys for their own safety. Since then our society has gone insane.
I'm for women tearing-down silly stereotypes. For instance, what's wrong with a woman driving a truck, or a race car, or being a plumber, or a mechanic, or a building contractor, or a doctor? These professions have historically been male-dominated and there's no good reason for it, but we're going too far.
Now it's about pitting men and women against each other and destroying what being a gentleman is all about, which is the lynch pin of any strong society. The powers that be want men to regard women as no different in any way other than in sexual terms. Not in my world, and apparently not in Joel Northrup's either. I have no doubt this young man will go far in this life. He can look back on this for the rest of his life knowing he did the right thing.
Anyone who thinks this is about fear of losing to a girl in a full-contact sport is missing the point, and I think most of them are missing the point on purpose. I would never want my daughter to marry a guy who has no compunctions about wrestling competitively with girls. Is that too lofty a concept for today's crass society to grasp? Apparently so.
It's about being a gentleman. It's about class. He opens the door for her. He lets her choose where she wants to sit. He waits for her to sit before he sits. He runs out to get the car so she won't get wet. He protects women. He never abuses them. He never refers to his girlfriend as "my bitch", or worse. Any real man with class isn't going to play organized, competitive, full-contact sports with girls.
When I played hockey in the 1970's feminism was going full-steam ahead, but girls were not allowed to play full-contact sports with boys for their own safety. Since then our society has gone insane.
I'm for women tearing-down silly stereotypes. For instance, what's wrong with a woman driving a truck, or a race car, or being a plumber, or a mechanic, or a building contractor, or a doctor? These professions have historically been male-dominated and there's no good reason for it, but we're going too far.
Now it's about pitting men and women against each other and destroying what being a gentleman is all about, which is the lynch pin of any strong society. The powers that be want men to regard women as no different in any way other than in sexual terms. Not in my world, and apparently not in Joel Northrup's either. I have no doubt this young man will go far in this life. He can look back on this for the rest of his life knowing he did the right thing.
Anyone who thinks this is about fear of losing to a girl in a full-contact sport is missing the point, and I think most of them are missing the point on purpose. I would never want my daughter to marry a guy who has no compunctions about wrestling competitively with girls. Is that too lofty a concept for today's crass society to grasp? Apparently so.
It's about being a gentleman. It's about class. He opens the door for her. He lets her choose where she wants to sit. He waits for her to sit before he sits. He runs out to get the car so she won't get wet. He protects women. He never abuses them. He never refers to his girlfriend as "my bitch", or worse. Any real man with class isn't going to play organized, competitive, full-contact sports with girls.
Friday, February 11, 2011
Mubarek Steps Down Today
Young Egyptians in the crowd were shouting "We are free!" Are they? Will they be? For now at least the army is in charge. To me that doesn't sound good. I know Egypt hasn't been a free republic they way the West knows them to be, but I never heard the American media celebrating the potential birth of a military dictatorship before, but they did today. They were downright ecstatic. This looks like a step backwards to me, but what do I know? My Pinto got wrecked so they gave me a Yugo. Let's celebrate!
What if the Muslim Brotherhood becomes the ruling political party? They've already killed two Egyptian presidents and they're very cozy with Hammas, and about 4 of 5 Egyptians think Hammas is O.K. To call them peaceful and tolerant is really, really, stretching it. Is that progress?
Ladies, what do you think about that? Why do I hear almost no women speaking on this subject? It's as if it's too horrible for Western women to think about the fact there are hundreds of millions of women in dozens of countries who have no rights and must live under their husband's thumb like it's 800 A.D. because of their nation's religion and customs. Instead, they pretend they don't exist while voting for people who help these Islamist types. Talk about head-scratchers! Islamist types don't believe in equal opportunity for women. Not by a long shot!
This is the sort of thing that makes me believe the mainstream press is anti-Semitic. Imagine if it were the other way around. Israel has the same president for 30 years, he becomes very unpopular, and protesters in the streets demand his immediate resignation. So he steps down, leaving the military in charge, and the most radical right-wing party in Israel looks like it will take over. Can you imagine the press cheering for that? I can't. That's why I can't escape thinking the press and this administration are Jew haters, or Israel haters at the very least.
Apparently they're not thinking about the fact Egypt controls the Suez canal, which is critical to both regional and worldwide trade. The implications are very far-reaching. The most obvious would be the price of gas escalating to several times what it costs now if radical Islamists gain control of the Suez canal. That is, of course, if we stick to our foolish policy of not allowing the expansion of domestic oil production, but that's a subject for another time.
What if the Muslim Brotherhood becomes the ruling political party? They've already killed two Egyptian presidents and they're very cozy with Hammas, and about 4 of 5 Egyptians think Hammas is O.K. To call them peaceful and tolerant is really, really, stretching it. Is that progress?
Ladies, what do you think about that? Why do I hear almost no women speaking on this subject? It's as if it's too horrible for Western women to think about the fact there are hundreds of millions of women in dozens of countries who have no rights and must live under their husband's thumb like it's 800 A.D. because of their nation's religion and customs. Instead, they pretend they don't exist while voting for people who help these Islamist types. Talk about head-scratchers! Islamist types don't believe in equal opportunity for women. Not by a long shot!
This is the sort of thing that makes me believe the mainstream press is anti-Semitic. Imagine if it were the other way around. Israel has the same president for 30 years, he becomes very unpopular, and protesters in the streets demand his immediate resignation. So he steps down, leaving the military in charge, and the most radical right-wing party in Israel looks like it will take over. Can you imagine the press cheering for that? I can't. That's why I can't escape thinking the press and this administration are Jew haters, or Israel haters at the very least.
Apparently they're not thinking about the fact Egypt controls the Suez canal, which is critical to both regional and worldwide trade. The implications are very far-reaching. The most obvious would be the price of gas escalating to several times what it costs now if radical Islamists gain control of the Suez canal. That is, of course, if we stick to our foolish policy of not allowing the expansion of domestic oil production, but that's a subject for another time.
Thursday, February 10, 2011
Egyptian "President" Mubarek Stepping Down
I guess this is a good thing. It depends on what sort of government replaces him. I'm not defending him. Anyone who calls himself a "president" for thirty years is not a president as we know presidents to be. I've noticed throughout my life that communist and many Arab countries have "presidents" who are in office an awfully long time and don't face the voters like any republic would expect them to. Egypt and Cuba are two of the best examples I can think of. Hugo Chavez of Venezuela is a newcomer in this, taking office democratically then stripping his parliament of all power until he is the undisputed ruler for as long as he likes. At the same time he began taking over his country's industries and is destroying their economy in the process. He began as a man of the people and now the people are afraid of him. The only real difference between Chavez and Fidel Castro is he took total power in stages. Castro did it all at once. Let that be a lesson to all. If there are any non-communist or non-Arab countries who have "presidents" who stay in office for decades please bring it to my attention. At this point in my life I believe these are the most dishonest governments in the world.
As for the current situation in Egypt, our administration is all over the map. Depending whether you listen to the president, his cabinet members, or his White House spokesman, the administration wants Mubarek to stay in power until reforms can be enacted, long enough for there to be an orderly election process, or he should step down right away. Egypt does have a constitution and it was reported that another election needs to take place before Mubarek steps down.
This administration is very weak in the area of foreign policy, something we can't afford these days. I'm generally not in favor of deep foreign entanglements as our founding fathers warned us about, but on the other hand this world is getting smaller and more dangerous by the day. Due to this, forging and maintaining alliances with countries that are interested in free societies, free trade, and common defense needs to be maintained. Our founders, wise and well-intentioned as they were, with a constant eye on maintaining liberty, didn't imagine jets, missiles, and nuclear weapons.
I suspect Obama wants there to be an Islamist government in Egypt. He seems to like radical Islamists and doesn't like Jews, England, or the United States for that matter. He seems to view the United States as a colonial power, which is ridiculous. Colonial powers, like the British Empire, occupied the countries they colonized and granted them few rights. The United States has never done this, but he seems to view both America and Britain in the same negative light.
From the beginning I've wanted to believe the best in him, but knowing about his radical associations and mentors, what's in the books he's written, his patterning his life after his father, and identifying himself with several self-proclaimed communists, I can only worry. I suspect he doesn't want the American people to know that he'd be happy if Egypt becomes much more like Iran politically. In defense of his father, I can understand him not liking colonial powers, since he came from Kenya, a former British colony, but his favoring communism is jumping out of the frying pan and into the fire.
Obama seeming to favor Islamists over Jews, particularly Israel, is a real head scratcher for me. There are many who think Jews control our whole banking system and economy, which I think is ridiculous. Jews are only 4% of the American population, so if they're really running the show what does that say about the rest of us? If that is true, that means 4% run the other 96%, so that would mean Jews are actually far superior to everyone else so they deserve to be in charge.
I can't help being logical, folks. With a scientific background it's something I can't avoid. I respect my profession and real science, so I apply the same logic to all areas of life, except maybe motorcycles and women. That is where I allow my emotions do the talking. Anything that is worth believing should be able to withstand honest scrutiny. That's why even though I was raised to be a union Democrat I no longer believe much of what I was taught when I was young. Once I was married, had a family, and began paying attention to current events, governmental affairs, and my life's experiences, it all began chipping away at almost everything I believed. As a result, my collectivist indoctrination dissolved like a sugar cube in the rain.
As for the current situation in Egypt, our administration is all over the map. Depending whether you listen to the president, his cabinet members, or his White House spokesman, the administration wants Mubarek to stay in power until reforms can be enacted, long enough for there to be an orderly election process, or he should step down right away. Egypt does have a constitution and it was reported that another election needs to take place before Mubarek steps down.
This administration is very weak in the area of foreign policy, something we can't afford these days. I'm generally not in favor of deep foreign entanglements as our founding fathers warned us about, but on the other hand this world is getting smaller and more dangerous by the day. Due to this, forging and maintaining alliances with countries that are interested in free societies, free trade, and common defense needs to be maintained. Our founders, wise and well-intentioned as they were, with a constant eye on maintaining liberty, didn't imagine jets, missiles, and nuclear weapons.
I suspect Obama wants there to be an Islamist government in Egypt. He seems to like radical Islamists and doesn't like Jews, England, or the United States for that matter. He seems to view the United States as a colonial power, which is ridiculous. Colonial powers, like the British Empire, occupied the countries they colonized and granted them few rights. The United States has never done this, but he seems to view both America and Britain in the same negative light.
From the beginning I've wanted to believe the best in him, but knowing about his radical associations and mentors, what's in the books he's written, his patterning his life after his father, and identifying himself with several self-proclaimed communists, I can only worry. I suspect he doesn't want the American people to know that he'd be happy if Egypt becomes much more like Iran politically. In defense of his father, I can understand him not liking colonial powers, since he came from Kenya, a former British colony, but his favoring communism is jumping out of the frying pan and into the fire.
Obama seeming to favor Islamists over Jews, particularly Israel, is a real head scratcher for me. There are many who think Jews control our whole banking system and economy, which I think is ridiculous. Jews are only 4% of the American population, so if they're really running the show what does that say about the rest of us? If that is true, that means 4% run the other 96%, so that would mean Jews are actually far superior to everyone else so they deserve to be in charge.
I can't help being logical, folks. With a scientific background it's something I can't avoid. I respect my profession and real science, so I apply the same logic to all areas of life, except maybe motorcycles and women. That is where I allow my emotions do the talking. Anything that is worth believing should be able to withstand honest scrutiny. That's why even though I was raised to be a union Democrat I no longer believe much of what I was taught when I was young. Once I was married, had a family, and began paying attention to current events, governmental affairs, and my life's experiences, it all began chipping away at almost everything I believed. As a result, my collectivist indoctrination dissolved like a sugar cube in the rain.
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
Businesses need to work with the government?
Our illustrious president said the other day that business needs to work with government to bring prosperity to all. I'm paraphrasing but that's the gist of it. At the same time GM is stealing taxpayer money to give themselves bonuses. Ah, business and government working together. Wholesale graft, anyone? Blatant violation of the constitution, anyone?
This guy makes me so sick it's gotten to the point I can't spend much time on anything he says or does. He is the worst constitutional violator we've ever had in the White House. He is drilling holes in our nation's bedrock and blasting away with C-4. Rather than continue to attempt to lead us all down the road to ruin he should be looking at a calendar, counting the days he has left in office. This is a one-term president. You can bank on it.
He's nothing but a racketeer. The last president was kind of dumb but at least he wasn't an arrogant crook like this schmuck. Oh, by the way, the recession, according to the government, has been over since last year. Anyone believe that? Wanna buy a swamp?
How's that hope and change working out for you, folks?
This guy makes me so sick it's gotten to the point I can't spend much time on anything he says or does. He is the worst constitutional violator we've ever had in the White House. He is drilling holes in our nation's bedrock and blasting away with C-4. Rather than continue to attempt to lead us all down the road to ruin he should be looking at a calendar, counting the days he has left in office. This is a one-term president. You can bank on it.
He's nothing but a racketeer. The last president was kind of dumb but at least he wasn't an arrogant crook like this schmuck. Oh, by the way, the recession, according to the government, has been over since last year. Anyone believe that? Wanna buy a swamp?
How's that hope and change working out for you, folks?
Monday, February 7, 2011
Congrats to the Packers
I picked the Packers to win this game 26-22. The game went pretty much like I thought it would, the biggest exception being the score didn't stay close throughout the game. The Packers were starting to run away with it in the first half and the Steelers deserve credit for getting back in the game and almost winning. That last offensive series for Pittsburgh was awful, though. That series was a huge whiff on the largest stage in all of sports. The other thing I didn't foresee was all the dropped passes by Green Bay. If not for those it would have been lights-out sooner.
Pittsburgh has some re-loading to do. They're not going to win another championship with that average offensive line and receiver corps. Big Ben also needs to cool it with the interceptions. He's been throwing quite a few lately, but I'll blame that (for now) on his offensive line that is clearly not up to Pittsburgh's usual standards. This also prevented the Steelers from running the ball effectively against the Packers which is what they really needed to do. That was the key to Pittsburgh winning, in my humble opinion. They also failed to take advantage of the Packers' other weakness, which is kick coverage.
The thing is there is so much parity today no team is without flaws. Every team is so-so or worse at certain positions. Every team can either be run on, passed on, their offense stinks to one degree or another, or they can't cover kicks. New England and Indy didn't defend well all year. Baltimore finally has an offense but their defense is fading. The Saints offense isn't as potent as it was last year and their defense is getting downright ordinary. At least the games are close as a result, but I'd rather have the days of dynasties when certain teams were good top-to-bottom. I think those teams will be the most remembered.
Now, if the Bills can only get it together next year, if there is a season at all. Yeah, I'm wishing for a lot, aren't I?
Pittsburgh has some re-loading to do. They're not going to win another championship with that average offensive line and receiver corps. Big Ben also needs to cool it with the interceptions. He's been throwing quite a few lately, but I'll blame that (for now) on his offensive line that is clearly not up to Pittsburgh's usual standards. This also prevented the Steelers from running the ball effectively against the Packers which is what they really needed to do. That was the key to Pittsburgh winning, in my humble opinion. They also failed to take advantage of the Packers' other weakness, which is kick coverage.
The thing is there is so much parity today no team is without flaws. Every team is so-so or worse at certain positions. Every team can either be run on, passed on, their offense stinks to one degree or another, or they can't cover kicks. New England and Indy didn't defend well all year. Baltimore finally has an offense but their defense is fading. The Saints offense isn't as potent as it was last year and their defense is getting downright ordinary. At least the games are close as a result, but I'd rather have the days of dynasties when certain teams were good top-to-bottom. I think those teams will be the most remembered.
Now, if the Bills can only get it together next year, if there is a season at all. Yeah, I'm wishing for a lot, aren't I?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)